Sign up for the brief. It is a daily newspaper that keeps readers up to date with the most important Texas news.
On Tuesday, the Texas House of Representatives voted for a revised draft to redraw the House District. This would allow Republicans to take a stronger position in the House of Representatives over the next decade. The motion will be brought back on track by the commission’s vote so that it reaches the House for debate in the coming days.
House Bill 1, by Republican Corpus Christi Republican Todd Hunter, who chairs the House constituency change committee, was held in a 16-hour marathon hearing that began Monday morning before being approved by the party’s line vote on Tuesday. Was. , replaced by a member of the committee.
The hearing, which featured hours of public testimony about the draft proposal to undermine the voting power of voters and the Democratic Party’s opposition, continued until Tuesday morning before Hunter resigned from the committee that afternoon. He said the move would give the committee members time to consider the changes before voting.
The draft would require a seal of approval from all rooms before it could go to the Senate for review. And that could continue to change before Congress sends it to Governor Greg Abbott’s desk for signature.
The modified HB1 isn’t much different from the first version Hunter presented last week. The draft aims to increase the power of the Republican Party throughout the state and the number of districts where white residents make up the majority of voters. The latest draft changes the factional breakdown between the Chamber of Commerce’s 150 districts by adding a district dedicated to the Democratic Party, giving Republicans a clear advantage.
Among the changes made to HB1 ahead of Tuesday’s vote was a reform by state legislator Craig Goldman of R-Fort Worth to redraw Collin County. The change included turning House District 70, currently held by Republican Scott Sanford, who is not seeking re-election, into a Democratic-minded district.
Another amendment by state legislators Jesse Jetton and R-Richmond reorganizes Bell County, and commission Democrats claim to split Killeen’s black population, where black residents make up 40% of the population. Down.
Texas Parliament is in the middle of a third special session this year. This is an overtime round ordered by the governor, with a primary focus on redrawing the political map of the state based on the latest census data. These data show that colored breeds have helped 95% of the state’s population growth over the past decade.
When Monday’s hearing took place on Tuesday morning, several Democrats on the commission asked Hunter to consider canceling the meeting due at midnight, and members considered proposed changes to the draft. He insisted that he needed more time to do so. But Hunter argued that the commission would implement at least 30 proposed amendments, most of which either failed or were withdrawn by the author.
One of the most tense moments in Monday’s hearing was Tuesday morning when an amendment to change the home districts of three counties along the Texas-Mexico border failed to get the party to vote. Democratic Party member Ryan Gillan of the Rio Grande City Democratic Party, who drafted the amendment, said the coordination was approved by a delegation in the Valley region and did not affect other districts. Nevertheless, some Republicans on the committee opposed the proposed changes.
A further amendment by state legislators Rafael Anchia and De-Dallas would have increased the number of Hispanic districts in the majority compared to Hunter’s proposal. It also failed to match the party’s vote.
Anchia called it “literally” [demonstrate] To what extent could the proposed map enable Latin representation of the state’s willing community? Regardless of the incumbent, “his revision would have gotten” an altogether more representative map. “Added.
When the hearings began on Monday, Hunter opposed reports that the House resolution reduced the number of blacks and Hispanics to a majority based on voters.
An analysis of the Texas Tribune map uses referendum age population (CVAP) from census estimates to determine the number of districts where the proposal has an increase in the majority of whites and the majority of black and Hispanic voters. I decided to reduce it. Hunter said that Texans counted under the CVAP metric were “important information excluded” and “estimated.”
The CVAP is an estimate from the census of eligible residents, but according to Hunter, voting age population (VAP) data is based on the latest census numbers obtained earlier this year. It was an accurate indicator. However, VAPs include non-citizens who are not eligible to vote.
“I want everyone to realize that inference-based analysis is not the same. [as] It is based on census data,” Hunter said.
According to Hunter, using the VAP, at the suggestion of his home, three additional majority-minority districts (two occupy the Hispanic majority and one black is in the resident majority). ) and state.
However, under the CVAP calculation, Hunter’s map proposal would reduce the number of districts with a majority of Hispanic voters from 33 to 30, and the number of districts with black residents, who make up the majority of the electorate, from 7 to 4. . On the other hand, the number of districts where white residents make up the majority of voters has increased by 6, from 83 on the current map to 89 in the Hunter Draft.
Hunters exempted the use of citizens’ voting age populations, which is an important way of considering fair representation of voters through what is known as an “opportunity district”. For example, in the Hispanic Opportunity District, Hispanic Texas people must make up the majority of the electorate and usually have the opportunity to choose their preferred candidates. The district also has to meet other complex criteria beyond population.
In a lengthy trial over state maps over the past decade, a federal judge held that majority civilian voting age populations were required as a criterion for considering opportunity districts. Defending the map in court, the state itself calculated the number of Hispanic opportunity districts based on CVAP estimates based on districts where Hispanic voters were the majority.
Earlier on Monday, Hunter also talked about hiring Republican constituency changer Adam Fortz, who was involved in drafting the Wisconsin legislative map since the GOP’s rule over the Wisconsin state legislature in 2010. These maps were called “a shameful attempt to hide the process of the constituency”. Change from public surveillance. “
Fortz told Hunter about the salary of the Texas Legislative Council, but added that the lawmakers were involved in meetings with both Democrats and Republicans during the mapping process. While engaging in constituency changes in Wisconsin, Fortz met with all Republicans in the state legislature, but no Democrats were involved, and signed a non-disclosure agreement to prevent further discussion of what they said. Put signature on. I had to sign.
Asked by state legislator Chris Turner, D-Grand Prairie, whether he knew the history of the forts before they were hired, Hunter said, “I don’t know what happened in Wisconsin.” I didn’t do it. “
“When I looked at his resume, he looked like a data person,” Hunter, the chairman of the House Democratic caucus, told Turner. “I liked him – and I chose him.”
Alexa Ura contributed to this report.
Texas House Commission forwards proposed map to House of Representatives
Source Link Texas House Commission forwards proposed map to the House of Representatives