The Mayor of London has approved a proposal to allow the Metropolitan Police Department to retroactively purchase and use facial recognition (RFR) technology to increase surveillance.
The proposal, signed last month, describes a £3,084,000 four-year contract between the Mayor of London and Northgate Public Services, a subsidiary of NEC Corporation, which was recently acquired.
According to the mayor’s office, the Metropolitan Police Department will begin using RFR technology to support investigations through facial recognition and matching in the coming months.
“The Metropolitan Police Department (MPS) will benefit from updated RFR search capabilities to enable more effective use of images and image frames from video data in all types of investigations,” the official document said. ..
The updated RFR feature allows MPS to process historical images from CCTV feeds, social media and various other sources to identify and apprehend suspects.
“Technological advances made in recent years will enable previously unavailable MPS opportunities to support face detection and matching,” the document states.
according to the report wiredThe Mayor’s Office has established an independent investigative group called the Metropolitan Police Department to review and advise the Metropolitan Police Department on the use of RFRs.
A spokesman for the Mayor of London said the RFR technology would help reduce the time it takes to identify suspects and reduce crime in the capital.
However, critics are dissatisfied with this claim, warning that RFR technology is dangerously vulnerable, could intensify existing discrimination and would unacceptably violate people’s privacy. ..
Ella Jakuboska, policy advisor at the advocacy group European Digital Rights, said RFR technology “could curb people’s freedom of expression, rally and their ability to live without fear.”
Since its inception, facial recognition technology has faced intense criticism from lawmakers and privacy advocates from various countries.
Opponents of the technology cite several studies that have found that facial recognition systems are prone to racial, age and ethnic biases that can lead to human rights violations.
They also argue that this technology can be an invasive form of surveillance.
In June, Elizabeth Denham, the head of the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) in the United Kingdom, said she was “deeply concerned” about the inappropriate and reckless use of live facial recognition (LFR) systems in public. Rice field.
In recent years, ICOs have conducted a number of studies on the planned applications of LFR technology and discovered the problems with all of them.
None of the organizations involved in these investigations were able to fully justify the processing of people’s data, and none of the deployed systems were found to be fully compliant with UK data protection regulations. did not do.
Last January, the Met announced that LFR technology has passed the pilot stage and is ready for permanent integration into regular police. A month later, we started installing LFT cameras at a place in London where serious criminals were expected to be found.
The Metropolitan Museum of Art claimed to have used police personnel to thoroughly test the system, and the results suggested that 70% of wanted criminals were identified when passing the camera. ..